Once upon a time, politics was just another topic at the dinner table, one that could spark debates or awkward silences but rarely a full-blown family rift. Sure, Uncle Joe and Aunt Carol might have gone at it over taxes, but at the end of the meal, everyone still passed the pie. Today, however, a red hat or a blue bumper sticker can end relationships faster than a Facebook argument escalates into all-caps insults. Politics has moved from the realm of policy into the core of personal identity, and it’s fundamentally reshaping how we interact with each other.

Let’s start with the obvious: the rise of hyper-partisanship. This isn’t just about Democrats and Republicans squaring off in Congress. It’s about the way those divisions filter down into our daily lives, dictating who we trust, who we talk to, and even who we’re willing to associate with. Political beliefs, once a secondary aspect of our identities, have become the primary lens through which we judge others.

Think about it. When someone mentions they voted for Trump, what’s your first reaction? Do you think about why they made that choice, considering their perspective and lived experiences? Or do you immediately assign them a set of characteristics based on stereotypes about their political affiliation? Be honest.

For many of us, it’s the latter. A person’s vote isn’t just a political decision—it’s a declaration of their values, their morals, their very essence. And in a world where politics feels like a life-or-death struggle over rights, freedoms, and the future of civilization, those judgments feel not only justified but necessary.

But here’s the thing: reducing people to their politics isn’t just intellectually lazy. It’s corrosive.

This topic is discussed in greater detail in Own The Libs: Politics is the New Personality. To grab your copy, click the link below.

From policy to personality

To understand how we got here, we need to look at how politics has shifted in recent decades. Once upon a time (say, mid-20th century), political parties were coalitions of diverse interests. People might vote Democrat because they were union members or Republican because they were business owners, but their party affiliation didn’t define their entire worldview.

Today, however, parties have become ideologically homogenous tribes. And these tribes aren’t just about policy differences—they’re about identity. The way you vote is now seen as an extension of who you are: your morality, your intelligence, even your worth as a human being.

Social media has turbocharged this phenomenon. Platforms like Facebook and Twitter (or X, depending on Musk’s whims) don’t encourage thoughtful debate. They encourage dunking contests. The algorithms reward outrage, sensationalism, and polarization, creating echo chambers where dissenting views aren’t just unwelcome—they’re viewed as existential threats.

The result is a feedback loop of extremism. People surround themselves with like-minded voices, reinforcing their beliefs and hardening their opinions. And when they encounter someone from the “other side”? It’s not just a disagreement—it’s a battle.

The social cost of political engagement

This shift has real-world consequences, especially when it comes to personal relationships. According to a 2020 Pew Research Center study, about half of Americans say they’ve stopped talking to someone because of their political views. Half. That’s not just a statistic—it’s a tragedy.

Imagine cutting off a childhood friend because they voted differently than you. Or avoiding family gatherings because Aunt Linda posts conspiracy theories on Facebook. These aren’t hypothetical scenarios—they’re the new normal.

And it’s not just about avoiding conflict. For many, it’s about protecting their mental health. Political arguments can be draining, especially when they feel like attacks on your core values. It’s easier to cut someone out than to constantly engage in exhausting debates.

But here’s the paradox: while distancing yourself from politically toxic relationships might feel like self-care, it can also deepen the divide. The more we segregate ourselves by ideology, the harder it becomes to find common ground. And without common ground, we’re left shouting past each other, trapped in an endless cycle of misunderstanding and mistrust.

The rise of political performative action

Politics has become performative. Think about the ubiquitous MAGA hats or the “I’m With Her” T-shirts. These aren’t just accessories—they’re symbols of allegiance, identity markers that say, “This is who I am, and this is where I stand.”

But while these symbols can foster a sense of belonging, they can also act as barriers. If someone walks into a room wearing a red hat, you probably make immediate assumptions about their beliefs, their values, maybe even their entire personality. And those assumptions, fair or not, shape how you interact with them.

The same goes for online interactions. Social media profiles are filled with political declarations, from hashtags to profile picture frames. These signals aren’t just about expressing beliefs—they’re about staking a claim in the culture wars.

But what happens when politics becomes your entire identity? When your worth is tied to your party affiliation, any criticism feels like a personal attack. And when everyone’s operating from that mindset, productive conversations become almost impossible.

Why we judge—and why it’s a problem

It’s easy to understand why we judge people based on their politics. In a polarized world, your political beliefs can feel like the ultimate moral litmus test. If someone votes for a candidate who opposes LGBTQ rights, does that mean they’re homophobic? If they support a party with a history of racism, does that make them complicit?

These are valid questions. But they’re also complex ones, and the answers aren’t always as clear-cut as we’d like them to be. People’s political decisions are shaped by a multitude of factors: their upbringing, their personal experiences, their economic circumstances. Reducing those decisions to a simple “good or bad” binary ignores that complexity.

It also ignores the fact that people can change. If we write someone off because of their political views, we lose the opportunity to influence them—or to be influenced ourselves.

Finding a path forward, together

So how do we navigate this minefield? How do we balance our convictions with our connections?

First, we need to start seeing people as more than their politics. That doesn’t mean ignoring harmful beliefs or tolerating bigotry. It means recognizing that everyone has a story, and that story is often more complicated than we realize.

Second, we need to rediscover the lost art of listening. Not to argue, not to persuade, but simply to understand. Listening doesn’t mean agreeing—it means opening the door to dialogue.

Finally, we need to remember that change starts with conversation. If we want to bridge the divide, we can’t do it by isolating ourselves in ideological bubbles. We have to engage, even when it’s uncomfortable.

At the end of the day, politics is important—but it’s not everything. People are more than their votes, their party affiliations, or their hashtags. They’re friends, family members, neighbors, and coworkers. And while we may never agree on everything, we can agree on this: the world is a better place when we talk to each other, not past each other.