JQCO, Ph.D. [in training]

Commentary from a communications perspective

How politics became the new personality test

Published by

on

Gone are the days when you could size someone up based on their taste in music or whether they’re a cat person or a dog person. Now, it’s all about where they stand on the latest social media-fueled outrage. The color of your hat can speak volumes. Your Twitter bio? A manifesto. The memes you share? A neon-lit signpost of your values. Politics has eclipsed personality, hijacked identity, and turned every social interaction into a minefield of ideological landmines.

It didn’t happen overnight, but the transformation is as undeniable as it is exhausting. Once upon a time, politics was a quiet, occasional feature of our lives, reserved for election seasons or the odd dinner-table debate. Today, it’s inescapable. A red hat doesn’t just mean you like baseball; it declares your allegiance. A rainbow flag isn’t just a celebration of diversity; it’s a stake in the cultural ground.

This shift is the love child of two powerful forces: social media and our innate tribalism. Social media, for all its promises to connect us, has proven remarkably efficient at dividing us. Algorithms have learned to amplify outrage, feeding us a steady diet of content that affirms our biases and vilifies “the other side.” Suddenly, it’s not just a disagreement over policy; it’s an existential battle for the soul of the nation. And, of course, where there’s conflict, there’s identity.

Humans have always been tribal creatures. It’s in our DNA to seek out groups, to find safety and strength in numbers. In the past, these tribes were based on geography, religion, or shared interests. Today, they’re ideological. And thanks to social media, they’re also performative.

This topic is discussed in greater detail in Own The Libs: Politics is the New Personality. To grab your copy, click the link below.

The persona politics phenomenon

When politics becomes identity, it becomes non-negotiable. It’s not about ideas anymore; it’s about who you are at your core. If someone criticizes your political stance, they’re not just disagreeing with your viewpoint; they’re attacking your very existence. This is where we find ourselves today, in a world where rational debate is about as fashionable as cargo shorts.

But why has this shift happened? Part of the answer lies in the way we consume information. The 24-hour news cycle and the endless scroll of social media have turned politics into a spectacle, and we’re all unwitting participants. The boundaries between public and private life have blurred, and political opinions are now seen as extensions of our personal brand.

In this brave new world, your opinions on taxation or healthcare are no longer just your opinions. They’re badges of honor, worn proudly in the digital town square. Or, they’re cautionary tales, fodder for the next viral callout. Either way, they’re visible and ripe for judgment.

Echo chambers and ego

Social media doesn’t just amplify our opinions; it cocoons us in echo chambers where we’re constantly validated. It’s intoxicating, isn’t it? The likes, the retweets, the dopamine hits that tell us we’re not just right, but righteous. We’re part of the good fight, and everyone else is either with us or against us.

This is where tribalism rears its ugly head. Humans have always been tribal creatures. It’s in our DNA to seek out groups, to find safety and strength in numbers. In the past, these tribes were based on geography, religion, or shared interests. Today, they’re ideological. And thanks to social media, they’re also performative.

You’re not just a Democrat or a Republican anymore; you’re Team Blue or Team Red. You’re not just pro-vaccine; you’re a proud member of Science Twitter. These identities come with rules, with scripts to follow and lines you can’t cross. And the penalties for breaking those rules? Swift and brutal. Social ostracism, public shaming, the digital scarlet letter.

The casualties of personality politics

What have we lost in this transformation? For starters, nuance. There’s no room for gray in a world painted in red and blue. Complex issues are reduced to hashtags. Policy debates are replaced by culture wars. And anyone daring to inhabit the middle ground is quickly dismissed as a fence-sitter, a traitor to the cause.

We’ve also lost the ability to see each other as multidimensional beings. Your neighbor isn’t just the guy who lent you a ladder; he’s a MAGA hat-wearing, Trump-loving redcoat (and therefore, irredeemable). Your college roommate isn’t just the person who made you laugh so hard you cried; she’s a “woke lib” who’s probably ruining the country with her avocado-toast-eating, student-debt-forgiving ways.

When politics becomes personality, it becomes impossible to separate the person from the policy. And that, perhaps, is the greatest casualty of all. We’re no longer engaging with ideas; we’re attacking each other. We’re not debating; we’re dehumanizing.

Moving forward in a politics-dominated world

So, what’s the solution? How do we reclaim our identities from the stranglehold of politics? It starts with stepping back from the ledge of performative outrage. It’s about recognizing that people are more than their political affiliations. It’s about having the courage to engage in uncomfortable conversations and the humility to admit we don’t have all the answers.

It’s also about resisting the pull of the algorithm, about seeking out diverse perspectives and challenging our own biases. This isn’t easy work. It requires effort, introspection, and a willingness to be wrong. But it’s worth it. Because at the end of the day, we’re not just avatars of our political beliefs. We’re human beings, messy and complicated and full of contradictions. And that’s something worth fighting for.

Leave a comment