Not everything in politics is up for debate. There are some values so deeply held, so tightly wound into the fabric of identity, that questioning them feels like a personal attack. These are sacred values—the moral cornerstones that transcend compromise and drive people to take seemingly irrational stances. And in the hands of a skilled political operative, they’re dynamite.

Sacred values are not unique to politics. They’re everywhere, from religion to family traditions. But in the political arena, they take on a life of their own, weaponized as tools of persuasion and division. Understanding how they work is key to unpacking why political rhetoric often feels more like a battlefield than a discussion.

Sacred values are great for mobilizing people, but they’re terrible for compromise. When a value becomes sacred, any trade-off feels like betrayal. This is why debates over abortion, gun rights, and freedom of speech often go nowhere.

This topic is discussed in greater detail in Own The Libs: Politics is the New Personality. To grab your copy, click the link below.

What are sacred values?

Sacred values are moral beliefs that are immune to trade-offs. They’re the things people say they’d never sacrifice, no matter the cost. Think about freedom of speech, the sanctity of life, or the idea of justice. These values aren’t just preferences; they’re identity-defining principles. And because they’re tied to identity, they resist negotiation. Asking someone to compromise on a sacred value is like asking them to saw off a piece of their soul.

Here’s the catch: sacred values are not always rational. They’re rooted in emotion and symbolism, not cost-benefit analysis. This makes them powerful—but also exploitable. Political rhetoric thrives on sacred values, because they tap into the deepest parts of who we are.

How scare tactics exploit sacred values

Enter scare tactics. Fear is one of the oldest tricks in the political playbook, and it works because it’s primal. When sacred values are under threat, people don’t just disagree—they rally, they fight, they vote. And politicians know this.

Consider immigration debates. For many, national identity is a sacred value. It’s about preserving a way of life, a culture, a sense of belonging. When politicians frame immigration as a threat to that identity, they’re not just making a policy argument; they’re triggering a sacred value. Suddenly, it’s not about border security; it’s about existential survival.

Or take climate change. On the left, the environment has become a sacred value. It’s tied to the idea of stewardship, of leaving the planet better for future generations. When opponents downplay the issue, it’s seen not just as ignorance but as heresy. The rhetoric escalates because both sides are defending what they see as non-negotiable truths.

Why sacred values shut down debate

Sacred values are great for mobilizing people, but they’re terrible for compromise. When a value becomes sacred, any trade-off feels like betrayal. This is why debates over abortion, gun rights, and freedom of speech often go nowhere. Each side sees the other not just as wrong but as morally corrupt. It’s not a disagreement; it’s a fight for the soul of the nation.

This moral absolutism is amplified by political rhetoric, which often frames issues as all-or-nothing battles. Politicians don’t say, “Let’s tweak this policy.” They say, “This is a war on your rights.” The language of war and survival activates sacred values, making people less likely to see shades of gray.

The psychological toll of sacred values

Living in a world dominated by sacred values and scare tactics isn’t just exhausting; it’s psychologically draining. When every issue feels like a battle for moral survival, it’s hard to find common ground. And the more entrenched we become in our sacred values, the harder it is to connect with those who see the world differently.

This isn’t to say sacred values are inherently bad. They’re part of what makes us human. But when they’re exploited for political gain, they can deepen divides and shut down meaningful conversation.

Moving beyond fear and absolutism

So, how do we move past this cycle? It starts with recognizing the difference between values and scare tactics. Not every disagreement is a threat to sacred values. And not every issue needs to be framed as a life-or-death struggle. Politicians and pundits thrive on our fear, but we don’t have to play along.

We also need to make room for complexity. Sacred values are important, but they’re not the whole story. Finding common ground means acknowledging that even deeply held beliefs can coexist with practical solutions. It means resisting the urge to see every compromise as a betrayal.

Finally, we need to remember that sacred values are a double-edged sword. They inspire us, but they can also blind us. The challenge is to hold onto our principles without letting them become weapons.

The bottom line

Sacred values are here to stay, and scare tactics aren’t going anywhere. But understanding how they work can help us navigate the treacherous waters of political rhetoric. It’s about seeing the manipulation for what it is and choosing not to let fear dictate our beliefs.

After all, politics is supposed to be about progress, not perpetual warfare. And while sacred values may guide us, they don’t have to divide us.